Sunday, July 2, 2017

Relationship Destroyers, Part 9 - Medicine Cabinets



MEDICINE CABINETS - HOLD 'DIRTY LITTLE SECRETS'




Medicine Cabinets Are 'Relationship Destroyers'!!!

It's a well-known fact that people like to snoop through bathroom medicine cabinets.  In fact, it is said that more than 50% of people who visit your home will really take a peek inside your medicine cabinet.  Many folks have advised that it's a wise move to take a peek into someone's medicine cabinet before you decide to get serious.

           The medicine cabinet tells volumes about a person who may not be sharing that important information with you! You'll see if you know their legal name, the kind of medications with the dates will suggest what health issues, both mental and physical are being medicated. This is such a phenomenon, that websites show slides and videos to give you voyeuristic peeks into a plethora of medicine cabinets. Everything from sex lube, poppers, prophylactics (if size matters to you - lol) denture cream and hemorrhoid suppositories to Prozac, Seconal, Oxycodone, and Viagra! Hell, you might get lucky to discover your prospective date or mate may have forgotten their stash of recreational drugs is in the bathroom, or maybe a sex toy! You might get a hint about their sexual practices, but of course, communication is necessary. There is a bundle of evidence to be discovered 'behind those closed doors'.

           You'll be much more informed from A to Z from the dirty little secrets hidden away in a person's medicine cabinet. The medicine cabinet is your best guide and confidential snitch to who you are befriending or who you have in your sights for a romantic partner. Better to be safe than sorry. When in doubt, check the medicine cabinet! Follow up with questions at another time. Be discreet. Loose lips sink ships.

Remember: "You are the company you keep."

P.S. Radio Stations! Yes, radio stations. Another minor tell-tale about a person is their 'radio station selection'.  Ever think about that? Notice what selection of music is close to the person's heart.  Music can give hints about background, culture, diversity and sometimes age if that's a concern of yours.  Check it out.  It can't hurt.

Yours Truly, Dr. Charlayne Grenci Website: http://www.drgrenciphd.com/

Dr. Charlayne Grenci’s latest book: BEHIND CLOSED DOORS
available as eBook in print
http://www.drgrenciphd.com/behind-closed-doors-detective-fly-on-the-wall/ 

Author page on Amazon:
https://www.amazon.com/Charlayne-Grenci/e/B00MYFLMZG/


SECRET CINEMAS: 10 Erotic Movie Fantasies by Charlayne Grenci Ph.D.
http://bit.ly/2j45NU3

Don’t miss to join author Charlayne Grenci Ph.D. at her Facebook site:
https://www.facebook.com/GMistress1980


<><><><><>

.

Dependency - Unrealistic Expectations - Part 8


Relationship Destroyers – Part Eight

Relationship Destroyers – About Intimate and/or Sexual Relationships:
PART 8 – DEPENDENCY – UNREALISTIC EXPECTATIONS
.




     Expectations, unrealistic expectations are a major relationship destroyer.  No matter how you look at it, no matter which half of the relationship you stand for, expectations are a killer.

This section could be a separate book in and of itself because it’s complex. complicated and sensitive material yet at the same time, if you look at the dynamics of ‘expectations’ through clear, unbiased, objective eyes, it’s not difficult to understand. I will explain it as I see it.

This blog will only deal with one aspect of it, and it’s getting clinical, but we’re all adults here, so you can handle this.

If the truth were told in equitable terms, we all have certain expectations of the person we share a relationship with. We expect this, we expect that – we wait for this, we imagine that and all of these expectations serve to fulfill our needs and desires or to compensate for what we feel we lack and deserve. Some fair, reasonable and appropriate depending on the situations at hand. Effectively or should I say

Some expectations are normal, fair, reasonable and appropriate depending on the situations at hand. Effectively or should I say Consequently, our personal expectations are commonly driven by our boundaries, beliefs, security status and sometimes an overall dependency.  This is where it gets tricky and interesting for some of us or sticky and horrific for others.  You say, what gets tricky and sticky?  Now, I’m going to take this discussion up a notch or two.

    Let’s talk about ‘unrealistic expectations’.
You knew that was coming and I hate to be the messenger of bad news, as they say, but here it is. Put your hip high latex boots on, okay, or rubber goulashes, and let’s begin to wade deeply into the mire of unrealistic expectations and why they are.

Example #1 
Let’s suppose Mary has a 9-5 professional job with a busy accounting firm. She leaves for work at 8:30 AM every morning and gets home around 5:30 PM if there are no errands, or stops to make on her way home. John worked as a computer tech so his job took him out on the road about town. They have been married less than a year with no children, yet. The couple has breakfast together most mornings unless Mary has to prepare something for work, and skips breakfast to get to work on time. After dating for several months, they decided to marry, their professions were in place and each one of them knew what type of schedule and demands came with their professions. John usually called Mary during her lunch hour, or Mary called him. Occasionally John text Mary. All was well at first.

After a few weeks into the marriage, John lost his job and ended up with a career of ‘looking for a job’, so his time was his own. John didn’t have a boss, no time clock, no daily structure, no hobbies, so he had a lot of time on his hands in between submitting applications for jobs over the Internet, or occasionally applying for jobs in person.  John became bored, lonely, frustrated and irritable.  He started calling Mary at work more often and wanted to know what she was doing and who she was with.  He began texting her several times a day and received a reply from Mary only when she was able to respond during her busy workload. When Mary arrived home in the evening, John started interrogating her about her day’s work, or if she was later than expected, why she was late getting home? Question: Do you see something wrong with this scenario? Of course, you do… if you don’t, you should. This is describing a major relationship issue.

We all have heard the saying: ‘Idle hands are the devil’s workshop’.
No truer words have been spoken. John was home alone every day while Mary was at work, but all John had to keep him occupied was the television, his computer, and his cell phone. He started getting more insecure without a job and started imagining Mary cheating on him. He became obsessed with calls and texts to Mary while she was at work. The longer this went on, the more paranoid and insecure he became which made him more suspicious and distrustful of Mary.

John’s psyche change from a proud, secure husband to a husband who was angry and short-tempered. His behavior appeared to shift from jovial, good-natured and fun-loving, to nasty, unreasonable… to irrational.  In short of time, John started calling Mary at work in the late afternoon to bitch and complain that he hadn’t heard from her. He was enraged, disrespectful and offensive on the phone, telling her she didn’t love him, respect him or care about his feelings because she didn’t call him, answer all his calls or reply to his barrage of texts. His continued and escalating, bad behavior upset Mary tremendously and it immediately started affecting her work. She loved him, but their relationship had become unhealthy and detrimental to her profession and job status.

Mary explained to John and tried to reason with him on several occasions that he was the one being disrespectful and insensitive to her, her job and it was fragmenting their relationship, but he insisted it was her fault and her responsibility to respect his feelings if she loved him.

This relationship was in a stalemate, a deadlock. John has probably been co-dependent most of his life, but since this couple was married after a brief dating period, the extent of his dependency wasn’t noticed by Mary immediately, especially because he held a job in the beginning.

Question:
Why did this happen? Who was right? What was the reason for John’s unrealistic expectations of Mary? This is only one example of where I see unrealistic expectations: John’s behavior was displaying an ‘unhealthy dependency’ in his relationship with Mary. He needed to have constant and close communication with her. For readers who are interested in a detailed definition, read below at Wikipedia.

This is just one perspective, my perspective of why it’s difficult to main a successful relationship and how the emotions involving “dependency” can be relationship destroyer. I welcome your opinions.  (to be continued in Part 9)

Wikipedia: Understanding Dependency (I edited it for this blog article)

"It is an emotional and behavioral condition that affects an individual’s ability to have a healthy, mutually satisfying relationship. It is also known as “relationship addiction” because people with co-dependency often form or maintain relationships that are one-sided, emotionally destructive and/or abusive."

Emotional dependency is when a woman allows others (like a significant other) to affect her feelings and emotions, and depends on them for happiness, etc. This is giving complete control to others over a woman’s own emotions. This is unhealthy and can negatively impact self-esteem since self-esteem is dependent on others. This is different from having a balanced relationship, where two people have interdependence and allow other to affect them only slightly emotionally. According to one relationship site, it is impossible to love others and not give them some control, but there needs to be a balance.
Mental Health America, a nonprofit association, defines co-dependency as “an emotional and behavioral condition that affects an individual’s ability to have a healthy, mutually satisfying relationship.”

Co-dependency as a broad definition is “dependence on the needs of or control by another,” according to Merriam-Webster. However, in the psychological sense, it is “a psychological condition or a relationship in which a person is controlled or manipulated by another who is affected with a pathological condition.”

Emotional dependency can also be found in people with dependent personality disorder, “a long-term (chronic) condition in which people depend too much on others to meet their emotional and physical needs,” according to Medline Plus, a service of the National Institutes of Health.

<><><><><>

.

The DAY the ONION CRIED

Relationship Destroyers – About Intimate and/or Sexual Relationships:
PART 7 – The DAY the ONION CRIED: 16 DYNAMICS of SUFFERING



We think about sex, infidelity, money, and lots of other things when we talk about relationship destroyers.  We also put the blame on mental cruelty and other abusive relationships.  Have we ever gone deep down into the mire of mixed emotions?

This Blog will be to the point about the major human condition that is likely to rule our personal world and predispose us for an imbalance in life.  I’m referring to suffering. Some of you might be thinking “enough said”, Dr. Grenci, ’cause I know all about suffering.  And I’ll agree with you, that you do.  We all do.  If you haven’t, I’m going to think you do not belong to our species, so where are you from?

I’m prepared to open a huge can of emotional worms here today. This discussion is not about being negative or trying to upset anyone.  This discussion is purely for the purpose of facing reality…. yes, the mute point underneath and on top of all this is – reality.  I don’t expect everyone to agree with me, or even read this article, but if you are interested in hearing about every fact and facet, every layer, depth, detail, and dimension of relationship destroyers, then you might want to relate to this.  We’re going to dig deeply and thoroughly into the emotion of suffering, so hold onto your hat, here we go.

Most couples go blindly into relationships bound by the new romance/limerence.  Limerence, (for those who aren’t familiar with the term) according to Wikipedia’s definition is: “Limerence (also infatuated love) is a state of mind which results from a romantic attraction to another person and typically includes obsessive thoughts and fantasies and a desire to form or maintain a relationship with the object of love and have one’s feelings reciprocated.”

Entering into relationships is new and exciting for most people, but I feel everyone should know about all the factors that can lead a relationship into disaster after the newness wears off.  So today, I’m going to elaborate on the dynamics and reality of human suffering.  Everyone has experienced it in one or many ways.

Suffering is all about emotional pain, and below is a list of the emotional pains we endure during a relationship (or not), some of them singly and others collectively:
Anxiety, depression, jealousy, envy, humiliation/embarrassment, fear, anticipation, worry, sorrow, grief, loss, anger, abuse, rejection, loneliness, hatred, self-loathing, also, all emotions involved with physical pain.
.
You may have guessed by now where this is going.  If not, I will explain. Romantic or love relationships are extremely difficult, hell, ALL relationships are a pain in the ass at times, because we’re all human.  We are humans with raw emotions to deal with, with each other and that’s difficult enough in and of itself, but that’s not the heaviest burden of it.

As I see it, our lives and relationships embrace a balancing act, trying to stay balanced on a tightrope of sorts.  We have the constant chore and conflict in which to balance out our emotions to stay sane, level headed, positive and inspired in order to be mentally healthy and productive – for starters.  Let’s dig a little deeper.  Keeping this balance isn’t easy by any means of reality.  This is where humans can lose sight of what’s happening, get caught up in a fragmentation before they realize it, or lose their way completely.

For example, let’s pretend our personal psyche is like an onion.  Let’s imagine our emotions are the multi-layers of skin on an onion, and each of those layers of skin represent one of the following emotions of the 16 Dynamics of Suffering: anxiety, depression, jealousy, envy, humiliation/embarrassment, fear, anticipation, worry, sorrow/grief, loss, anger, abuse, rejection, loneliness, hatred, self-loathing, all emotions involved with physical pain.  Let’s start peeling away the layers of skin on that onion. Are you still with me? Okay then, during a relationship, how many of the above emotions have you had to deal with both voluntarily or involuntarily during a relationship?  How many of those emotions have put pressure on your relationship?  How many of those emotions have caused dissension, arguments or resentment?  How many of those emotions either with you OR your partner, or both of you, have been responsible for a break-up or a divorce?  How many of you have experienced a love-hate relationship?

Now, let’s take a look at that whole picture.  Look at all of the human emotions we have to deal with while trying to maintain a well-balanced relationship! That being said, the other dynamics and reality of emotions concerning human relationships are love, sex, pleasure, romance, happiness, health, and fun/excitement.  Let’s call the center of the onion, the positive and essential core of life which embraces: love, sex, pleasure, romance, happiness, health, and fun/excitement.

It’s safe to say we are forced to deal with trying to balance the negative with the positive, some of the 16 Dynamics of Suffering – with the 7 Positive Dynamics of Relationships: love, sex, pleasure, romance, happiness, health, and fun/excitement.

This is a huge problem, people. Suffering on any or every level is a problem. I’m using suffering as the umbrella term to include all the emotional pains.

Suffering appears to be at constant war and conflict with the few delightful emotions we possess.  Consequently, in many relationships, the human condition of “suffering”, for whatever reason(s), outweighs, and wins over the love and happiness features.  It’s sometimes a frightful and disturbing contest of emotions.  It appears in most circumstances that the odds (of emotional suffering) are stacked against us before we embark on a new relationship.

This is just one perspective, my perspective of why it’s difficult to maintain a successful relationship and how the emotions involving “suffering” can be relationship destroyers. I welcome all your opinions.
(to be continued in Part 8)

<><><><><>




Friday, April 14, 2017

12 Ways to Simplify Your Life

.
Courtesy of: NetCredit
.

Tuesday, April 11, 2017

Decadence, Sex, and Crime Behind Closed Doors




Did you ever wish to get a peek behind closed doors - or you imagined you would be a tiny fly to get access and find out what's really going on in the lives of others? Experience in this fictional investigation of a detective "fly on the wall", your narrator, the shocking, uncensored stories about the private lives and double lives of people we think we know. 
.

Take a peek behind the masks of hypocrisy and the walls of deception that lurk and thrive in the mainstream; the secret, desperate lives of sinners, perverts, and criminals that remain usually well hidden in posh mansions from the wrath and condemnation of our society.
.

BEHIND CLOSED DOORS is available at:
Amazon.com, Amazon.ca, Amazon.de, Amazon.fr, Amazon.co.uk, Barnes&Noble, Kobo, Gardners, Scribd, Story Tel, OverDrive, Bookmate, and much more retailers.

.
Reading BEHIND CLOSED DOORS: Detective Fly On The Wall, you will likely agree that author Charlayne Grenci Website bluntly wrote bizarre, fictitious tales with sinister, violent, gruesome and highly emotional plots.  Her purpose was to expose and dramatize the true reality of what goes on in the private lives of people in suburban America.
.

Follow the Author:
Website
Author Page
Amazon Page
Facebook
LinkedIn
Google+
Twitter: @CharlayneGrenci
.

More books by Dr. Charlayne Grenci:

Queen of Domination: My Secret Life
Marcel Proust EXPOSED
SECRET CINEMAS
Last Curtain for a Stripper
A Politician EXPOSED






Monday, April 3, 2017

Relationship Destroyers




Relationship Destroyers - About Intimate and/or Sexual Relationships
by Dr. Charlayne Grenci


PART One
Who is a relationship destroyer? Sounds cruel? Do you know someone who you would label a "relationship destroyer"? Come on now... we're adults here. We're not being judgmental. We are simply having an intellectual discussion about one of the most important, controversial and debated subjects of serious concern. If you agree, continue reading.

If you are a "know it all" or you prefer to turn a blind eye to the importance of discussing relationships, discontinue reading and go find something to read or to do that's more appealing to you. In this case, I will believe you have had perfect relationships in the past, you are in an idyllic, loving relationship now, and that you are the ideal, faultless partner. Good for you. If that's the case, maybe we should clone you now or bow down to your holiness. 

But the reality is... most people do not have perfect relationships, in fact, most people, I didn't say all... I said, most people have demanding, troublesome, tormented and/or loveless relationships. Would you like to add a few of your own adjectives to this list?

Oh, did I forget abusive? Yes, abusive relationships. I'm not referring to people who physically abuse their partner; I'm talking about people who verbally, emotionally and/or physically abuse their partner. But this discussion isn't about domestic violence, though that is another subject of serious concern.

You can see why discussions about relationships are necessary, debatable and why there are many dynamics in relationships that can be studied and challenged.
The reality is this: we are all potential or confirmed relationship destroyers of one kind or another! It's not necessarily intentional. It's an element of the human condition. Some humans have mastered the art of being a relationship destroyer. Other humans are merely practicing it, slowly getting more efficient in their involvement with it, seeing it happen before their eyes but unable to stop it. And there are others who are completely oblivious to the endless dynamics which can cause the fragmentation and destruction of their relationship. 

So who causes this and why?  Men may say: it was my wife's fault or my girlfriend's fault. Women may say their husband or boyfriend is to blame. You may say: it wasn't me; I didn't do anything wrong, or maybe: I was a little to blame, but it was mostly my partner's fault. Who is right? Who is at fault? Now, are you being judgmental?



PART Two
To begin with, unfortunately, the majority are at fault for taking a part in destroying a relationship or relationships. Period. Only the brave and confident will agree and admit to being at the very least, partially to blame for having their part in ruining or fragmenting a relationship.

As I see it, much of this is a result of what we learn in childhood from parents, family, and friends, how we interpret relationships as a child, and how we relate in adulthood to how and what we interpreted relationships as children. 

Another key factor is: what we are NOT taught as children and growing up. We are taught and study English, Math, Social Studies, and Science in grade school, then go on to the same plus Biology, a foreign language, electives, etc. and on to college for the advanced courses, majors, maybe adding psychology, human sexuality or sociology to the mix, etc., but what class or course taught us specifically how to have a successful relationship?

All the comments made so far are true and are the basics, the principles of what we were taught and that's was all well and good, but was it enough? Obviously not. Trust, respect, honesty, communication and fidelity are the main principles for most romantic or sexual relationships. Trust, respect, honesty and communication are the main principles of most all other relationships, too. But once again, do you think these basic principles are enough to ensure most intimate or sexual couples of a harmonious, fun-loving, romantic, successful, lengthy relationship? 


PART 3 - Are Your Ready To Get Serious Here?
I was pleased to receive your responses and everyone's comments in Part 2 were right because those were the main principles we were taught to abide by to maintain the best relationship(s) possible. To remember the conclusion of PART 2, we agreed that: Trust, respect, honesty, communication and fidelity are the main principles for most romantic or sexual relationships. I asked: "Do you think these basic principles are enough to ensure most intimate or sexual couples of a harmonious, fun-loving, romantic, successful, lengthy relationship?" The answer is flat out - NO! 

Before I continue with an explanation, I will tell you briefly about myself, because an insight to my thinking and philosophy is necessary for you to understand how and why I come to the conclusions I do. That, in and of itself, still might not be enough for you to follow my train of thought, and that's okay. 

I don't expect all of you to do so, for the simple reason we all come from different places in life at the present time, different lifestyles, different cultures, different belief systems/traditions, different educational backgrounds, different family values, different morals and different experiences, etc. That's what makes the world go round! That's all a beautiful thing! The conflict I foresee is this: because every one of us is basically so different, it may be impossible for you "to see through my eyes", to understand how and why I arrive at my conclusions? But I will continue.    

As you might know or bear in mind, I am far from being traditional or conservative on most levels and I think "outside the box", I always have. When I was 10 years old, I questioned religion. I asked my mother why do they tell me the same stories every week in Sunday School? Many physicians (after office hours), professors and mainstream people since the age of 12 years old, have kept me aside to "pick my brain", as it's called. It has been a common occurrence for me to hear this. 
Naturally, I have always willingly obliged, but I am able to learn as much from others, maybe more, than they learn from me. These interviews or discussions, as they were, taught me to be a good listener, which is most important, as well as a guest speaker and mentor. As the years flew by, the profound influence of frequent intimate, conversational interaction with amazing people, influenced me to be an educator/professor myself and thereby I discovered one of my most revered passions! 

Writing has become as much of a passion. So you're saying, if you have read thus far, "Come on now, Dr. Grenci, spit it out! Get on with it." And my answer to that would be: "Slow down, take a deep breath. Be patient. Subjects of this magnitude (such as: About Intimate and/or Sexual Relationships) cannot be rushed through! The topic I chose must be thought out decisively, discussed and reasoned with. That one of the issues with relationships: we have just identified one of the major issues with relationships, so number one is:

STOP, LOOK & LISTEN: Slow down, take a deep breath, listen/hear & be patient = most people are rushing through life with personal troubles, deadlines, medical concerns, family anxiety, job pressures, financial problems/stress and, and, and - we don't take enough (or any) necessary time needed to communicate 'thoroughly and respectfully', to hear and understand what our partner is saying/sharing, or to take them seriously. 

Therefore we are often - not on the same page. You may think you have listened and communicated because you have talked and aired your feelings, but in reality, if it was not done properly, you could have caused more harm than good. In addition - yes, a relationship IS a lot of work! If you think not, you're wasting your time and his/hers. What do you think about that? Your comment always welcome.  






PART 4 - The Famous 5 Plus - The Main Attractions - Is it Chemistry? 
Or Can Chemistry be an Umbrella Term? Are Our 'Five Senses' & Imagination Necessary for a Successful, Sexual Relationship? Are We challenged by Sexual Chemistry? 

Do we rely on these famous five - plus our imagination to tell us if we are sexually suited for one another? Do we, or should we have a daily diet or at least, a continuous diet of the 'famous five plus' to keep a relationship sexually alive? You better believe you should. My musing continues here.

For most people, I believe we would all agree, that initially, the main attraction from one person for another is a sexual attraction or sexual chemistry. With some couples sexual chemistry maybe be intense, but with others, it may be milder in nature, however, the important factor is that you have a compatible libido with your partner so that both individuals feel satisfied instead of neglected or pressured into intimacy they don't desire.

For the sake of argument, let's use 'chemistry' as an umbrella term because there are other things that can keep chemistry alive and functioning, but unfortunately, many people tend to forget what may have caused the chemistry in the first place so I will elaborate, as I see it. Like I said before, everything is debatable, because everything is "in the eyes of the beholder", and we all differ in our likes and dislikes.

Each term or terms number one to number five (below) can handle a chapter of their own, however, listed here to make a point. These are the factors that I feel deal with chemistry. 

1- Sight = Provocative or Debonair dress - is a sexual attraction. Sometimes it's the first thing you see about another person. It can have the power to make it or break it. Erotic, revealing wear and/or chic, elegant or trendy fashions might turn you on. Everyone has their own opinion of what kind of wear is sexy to them - what catches their eye and turns them on.

2- Sight and Hearing = Flirting - can be for the purpose of suggesting you are sexually interested in someone, or it can be done in a playful, entertaining mode. Flirting can be sexually provocative or fun-loving. Body language, facial expressions, and sex talk play in here.

3- Hearing = Sex Talk - many people use sexual innuendos to imply/suggest they are romantically or sexually interested. (not exactly dirty talk, yet - we'll get to that later). Sex talk is used to heighten sexual desire and/or arousal. Sex talk is good before or during physical sexual activity, though some people are either uncomfortable with it or not good at it.

4- Smell, Taste, and Touch - I like to think of these three as the "tantalizing trio. This is a chapter in and of itself. 

5- Fantasy = Imagination - we have the ability to use our imagination for sexual enhancement/stimulation.

Taking number one to number five plus Imagination into consideration, most all of which are typically important in the commencement and development of a sexual relationship. Do you find any of these 5+ more important than the others? Okay, I'm certain you favor some more than others, because some affect you more than others. Understood. As a sexual relationship progresses, do these five things stay in the limelight of importance? Or do some or all of these famous five+ start falling by the wayside as the relationship matures? 

Without getting into deep detail, the bottom line is this: as a relationship matures, people tend to pay less attention to the main attractions which were essential and/critical to initially launch their sexual relationship. They become more comfortable and less attentive, without realizing that all things still matter and attention is needed to maintain a successful, healthy, sexual relationship.... 



PART 5 -  Relationship Cages
Note: I may have a strange and unique way of expressing my views about relationships, but the reason is simply this... it's my opinion.  

Unless your passion is to be someone's submissive or sex slave or you are a devout masochist, relationship cages a turn-off, suffocating, threatening, and damned nerve-racking. Cages are relationship destroyers for many individuals. If you are a cage creator and cage keeper, you may be a relationship destroyer, depending on the personality of your other half. 

If you are thinking, what cages? I'm going to take a peek inside these cages and right into the heart of the matter, so if you are the cage keeper and you have keys to the locks of these cages - open them. If you are locked in cage number one.... ah, ... GET OUT! Cages number two and number three speak for themselves.

Relationship Cages Can Cause Weak Links or Destroy Relationships!

Cage #1 - JEALOUSY: Do you often find yourself in emotional turmoil? Do your emotions suffer in silence? Do you find yourself walking on eggshells in fear of upsetting your partner or spouse? Do you try to avoid doing things that will cause his or her jealousy to flare? Okay then, there you go.... you're locked up in a cage labeled jealousy; the boundaries you adhere to, to spare an argument (or not); the rules,  regulations, restrictions and expectations that are imposed on you because of someone's jealousy, can be emotionally unhealthy, can cause deep-seeded resentment and can destroy your feelings for that person in time. Some people may add possessiveness to this cage. In short, the restrictions a partner/spouse espouses and enforces on you is a relationship destroyer. The cage of/from jealousy!

Cage #2 - INSECURITY: yes, this is a big one, too. This cage is often self-inflicted. Are you in a relationship cage for reasons related to security or insecurity? Do you feel your insecurities are responsible for putting you in a cage - you do this willingly or unconsciously for protection and/or survival? Have you wanted to bust out of your cage and run away but your need for security/your innate insecurities keep you locked up where you are right now? For some people, cage number two can embrace loneliness and the need for companionship. The cage of insecurity!

Cage #3 - FANTASIES: Do you harbor your deepest fantasies? Do you feel you have to suppress your fantasies rather than share them with your partner or spouse because you're afraid of the reaction you will receive? I can tell you from experience that your fantasies are safe and secure left alone and lurking privately in your own imagination. It is true that most people cannot handle hearing about another person's deepest, darkest fantasies. They can be interpreted as demented, repulsive, bizarre, macabre, threatening, insulting, critical and/or adulterous. Some partners are told that masturbation is cheating! How fucked-up is that? Communication and sharing are great until it comes to 'fantasies', then you may experience what I'm talking about.

So, unless your partner/spouse is known to be extremely open-minded and non-judgmental, think seriously before divulging your dark, secret fantasies. Keep them safe and sound locked up in your fantasy mind - 'the cage' that keeps your deepest fantasies under lock and key. Of course, we know that most fantasies are better left alone in our fantasy mind anyway. Many fantasies can backfire in reality! Use caution here. The Cage for Fantasies! 



PART 6 - When two became one - or joined at the hip: 
RED FLAG - Haven't I Heard That Somewhere Before? 
Note: I may have a strange and unique way of expressing my views about relationships, but the reason is simply this... it's my opinion. 
Old school, maybe, but we've definitely become familiar with the saying, 'when two become one'. Another familiar saying is: 'joined at the hip'. You might think, cute, sweet, how wonderful that sounds, but the reality is... that philosophy is... a relationship destroyer. Maybe not today, maybe not when you first think it or say it, but on down the road, being up someone's ass after a certain amount of times can get extremely uncomfortable, or... painful. Yikes!

However, there is a lot of truth in the saying: 'too close for comfort' and 'absence makes the heart grow fonder'. Have you ever wondered where those saying came from? I realize when your love is new, or your chemistry is on fire, that's how you may feel, thinking: OMG, I want to be with him (or her) every minute of the day and night. 

I applaud your feelings and celebrate your reasoning... for now. But for most couples, that need and desire will eventually wane down to another level. I say eventually, giving most couples the benefit of the doubt, but for other couples, the need to be joined at the hip may end more quickly, even abruptly.

People require space to breathe. Individuals need to be just that... individuals. Each of us has our own uniqueness, character, talents and gifts. A person can lose the sight and significance of their own being and identity if they are tied up too tightly to someone else. (unless you're in an erotic bondage situation, of course.) 

Everyone has the power and privilege to shine on his/her own merit, without having to be 'joined at the hip' with someone else. It's not emotionally healthy. You can lose yourself effectively by thinking, 'he's or she's my whole life. I cannot bear to be away from him/her. I don't want him/her out of my sight. 

All well and good, for now, but time, circumstances and events change everything and they will change you to a degree or two, also. If someone wants to keep close tabs on you at all times, there is a critical problem. Trust issues come to mind. The trust issue is of gigantic proportions and we'll discuss that later, but for now, just bear in mind that if you or someone you love demands constant company and fifty calls a day when you are not home, you may be involved with a seasoned control freak. Don't take that lightly, unless you're on the same page and then I would ask you 'why'?

In my perspective, I enjoy someone's company much more if there are significant time lapses between our times together. Many couples, maybe most, don't agree with this philosophy and I understand that. That's a shame the way I look at it, because how many couples are truly happy and content with their partner? If the whole truth was known, most couples could not commit to describing their relationship as 'truly happy and content'. Folks, listen up. There's a reason(s) this is true. Do people even dare tell their partners how they truly feel? That's a scary thought and their privately disclosed answers might shock you. 

Take a breather here and there away from your partner. Do things by yourself, enjoy your own company, work on your hobby, enjoy your favorite sport, go shopping or out to lunch with a friend (a genuine, trusted friend who only has your happiness and well-being at heart, not one who is eager to ruin your relationship). When money or an injury is a problem, there are others ways to 'take a break'.

Take a book, puzzle or laptop out to the patio or into the study for a few hours of quiet time. Go to the park or the beach and enjoy nature for a few hours, or take in an afternoon matinee at the nearby theater; walk briskly inside, around a mall for some cardio with visuals, or window shop at an antique mall. It's not uncommon for me to spend a couple of hours in a bookstore, many times over three or four hours, but then I have a passion for books and research. 

The point I'm making here is that in order to keep your individuality, preserve your sanity, and help protect your relationship from becoming mind-numbing, stale and boring, there are particular, healthy, interesting things you can do for yourself that will keep you in a more positive, energized state of mind and a more exciting, refreshing person to be with. (to be continued in Part 7)
.




ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Charlayne E. Grenci, Ph.D. is a clinical sexologist and clinical professor, an author and a relationship expert; a graduate from Maimonides University, an affiliate of The American Academy of Clinical Sexologists and a Diplomat of The American Board of Clinical Sexology. She has a private practice in Southern Florida and is also a guest lecturer.

Dr. Grenci specializes in life coaching, sex education and instruction for individuals, couples, or groups who are seeking advice, information, and support for improving sexual relationships, sexual issues or alternative lifestyles.
Charlayne E. Grenci, Ph.D. has inspired, entertained and educated thousands of people for over thirty-six years with her knowledge, experience, and amazing life's story.

Dr. Grenci is available for book-signing presentations, guest speaker presentations and seminars, private office sessions and special educational courses. Dr. Grenci is also a specialist in relationship and marriage issues and pre-marital coaching.


CONTACT INFORMATION

Dr. Charlayne Grenci
For Information on Private Sessions and other Inquiries, such as  booking of Guest Speaking Engagements

Follow the Author:
Twitter: @CharlayneGrenci

Readers can also order signed print books by Dr. Grenci directly at the author’s website:
Queen of Domination: My Secret Life
Marcel Proust EXPOSED
SECRET CINEMAS
BEHIND CLOSED DOORS


Saturday, April 1, 2017

Last Curtain for a Stripper - Choose the Cover



Be one of three winners of a short-story ebook by just answering this question: 
Which book cover would you choose for this prequel: 

LAST CURTAIN FOR A STRIPPER






Available soon at Amazon, Barnes&Noble, Kobo and iBooks. Contains two stories of the upcoming print and ebook version of BEHIND CLOSED DOORS where a little house fly is doing what we often wish: looking behind closed doors and spying on our neighbors, on society members, politicians and celebrities. You might be shocked to hear what the little spy fly tells you about sex and crime in these posh neighborhoods.
So, here are the two versions:
Would you choose the cover with the red title? #1Or the cover with the title font in white? #2
Send an email to 111Publishing at gmail.com and write either
red title? #1  or
white title? #2directly into the subject line.
Good luck to the three winners.

.
.
<><><><><>






Airline Pilot - a Dream Job?




Pilots are highly trained professionals who either fly airplanes or helicopters to carry out a wide variety of tasks. Most are airline pilots, Co-Pilots, and flight engineers who transport passengers and cargo.

But one out of five pilots is a commercial pilot - involved in tasks such as dusting crops, spreading seed for reforestation, testing aircraft, flying passengers and cargo to areas not served by regular airlines, directing fire-fighting efforts, tracking criminals, monitoring traffic, and rescuing and evacuating injured persons.

Generally, the most experienced pilot, the captain, is in command and supervises all other crew members. The pilot and the Co-Pilot, often called the first officer, share flying and other duties, such as communicating with air traffic controllers and monitoring the instruments.

Some large aircraft have a third pilot, the flight engineer, who assists 
the other pilots by monitoring and operating many of the instruments and systems, making minor inflight repairs, and watching for other 
aircraft. The flight engineer also assists the pilots with the company-, air traffic control, and cabin crew communications.

New technology 
can perform many flight tasks, and virtually all new aircraft now fly with only two pilots, who rely more heavily on computerized controls.”

Before departure, pilots plan their flights carefully. They thoroughly check their aircraft to make sure that the engines, controls, instruments, and other systems are functioning properly. They also make sure that baggage or cargo has been loaded correctly. They confer with flight dispatchers and aviation weather forecasters to find out about weather conditions en route and at their destination.

Based on this in
formation, they choose a route, altitude, and speed that will provide the safest, most economical, and smoothest flight. When flying under instrument flight rules — procedures governing the operation of the aircraft when there is poor visibility — the pilot in command, or the company dispatcher, normally files an instrument flight plan with air traffic control so that the flight can be coordinated with other air traffic.
Take-off and landing are the most difficult parts of the flight, and require close coordination between the pilot and first officer. For example, as the plane accelerates for takeoff, the pilot concentrates on the runway while the first officer scans the instrument panel.

To calculate the speed they must attain to become airborne, pilots consider the altitude of the airport, outside temperature, weight of the plane, and speed and direction of the wind. 

The moment the plane reaches takeoff speed, the first officer informs the pilot, who then pulls back on the controls to raise the nose of the plane. Pilots and first officers usually alternate flying each leg from takeoff to landing.
Unless the weather is bad, the flight itself is relatively routine. Air
plane pilots, with the assistance of an autopilot and the flight managementncomputer, steer the plane along their planned route and are monitored by the air traffic control stations they pass along the way.

They regularly scan the instrument panel to check their fuel supply; the condition of their engines; and the air conditioning, hydraulic, and other
systems. Pilots may request a change in altitude or route if
circum
stances dictate. For example, if the ride is rougher than expected, pilots may ask air traffic control if pilots flying at other altitudes have
reported better conditions; if so, they may request an altitude change.
This procedure also may be used to find a stronger tailwind or a weaker
headwind to save fuel and increase speed.

In contrast, because he
licopters are used for short trips at relatively low altitude, helicopter pilots must be constantly on the lookout for trees, bridges, power lines, transmission towers, and other dangerous obstacles.

Regardless of the type of aircraft, all pilots must monitor warning
de
vices designed to help detect sudden shifts in wind conditions that can
cause crashes. Pilots must rely completely on their instruments when
visibility is poor. On the basis of altimeter readings, they know how
high above ground they are and whether they can fly safely over
mountains and other obstacles. 

Special navigation radios give pilots precise information that, with the help of special maps, tells them their exact position. Other very sophisticated equipment provides directions to a point just above the end of a runway and enables pilots to land completely without an outside visual reference.

Once on the 
ground, pilots must complete records on their flight and the aircraft maintenance status for their company and the FAA.

The number of nonflying duties that pilots have depends on the
em
ployment setting. Airline pilots have the services of large support
staffs and, consequently, perform few non-flying duties. However, be
cause of the large numbers of passengers, airline pilots may be called
upon to coordinate handling of disgruntled or disruptive passengers.


Pilots employed by other organizations, such as charter operators or
businesses, have many other duties. They may load the aircraft, handle
all passenger luggage to ensure a balanced load, and need to supervise
re-fuel
ing; other nonflying responsibilities include keeping records, scheduling flights, arranging for major maintenance,and performing minor
aircraft maintenance and even repairs.

Some pilots are flight instructors. 
They teach their students in ground school classes, in simulators, and in dual controlled planes and helicopters. A few specially trained pilots are examiners or check pilots. They periodically fly with other pilots or pilot’s license applicants to make sure that they are proficient.

Working Conditions: Because of FAA regulations, airline pilots, flying
arge aircraft, cannot fly more than 100 hours a month or more than 
1,000 hours a year. Most airline pilots fly an average of 75 hours
a month and work an additional 75 hours a month performing non-
flying duties.

Most pilots have a variable work schedule, working 
several days on, then several days off. Most spend a considerable amount of time away from home because the majority of flights involve overnight layovers. When pilots are away from home, the airlines provide hotel accommodations, transportation between the hotel and airport, and an allowance for meals and other expenses.\

Airlines operate flights at all hours of the day and night, so work schedules often are irregular. Flight assignments are based on seniority. An airline seniority number is normally assigned to a pilot on completion
of training. The sooner pilots are hired, the lower their seniority num
ber, the stronger their bidding power.

Commercial pilots also may have 
irregular schedules, flying 30 hours one month and 90 hours the next. Because these pilots frequently have many nonflying responsibilities, they have much less free time than do airline pilots. Except for corporate flight department pilots, most commercial pilots do not remain away from home overnight. But, they may work odd
hours. However, if the company owns a fleet of planes, pilots may fly
a regular schedule.

Flight instructors may have irregular and seasonal 
work schedules, depending on their students’ available time and the weather. Instructors frequently work in the evening or on weekends.

Airline pilots, especially those on international routes, often experience
jet lag—fatigue caused by many hours of flying through different
time zones. To guard against pilot fatigue, which could result in unsafe
flying conditions, the FAA requires airlines to allow pilots at least 8
hours of uninterrupted rest in the 24 hours before finishing their flight duty. 

Commercial pilots face other types of job hazards. The work of test 
pilots, who check the flight performance of new and experimental planes,
may be dangerous. Pilots who are crop-dusters may be exposed to toxic 
chemicals and barely ever have the benefit of a regular landing strip. Helicopter pilots involved in rescue and police work may be subject to 
personal injury.

Although flying does not involve much physical effort, the mental
stress of being responsible for a safe flight, regardless of the weather,
can be tiring. Pilots must be alert and quick to react if something goes
wrong, particularly during takeoff and landing.


<><><><><>



Thursday, March 16, 2017

Fair Use: Myths and Facts



Fair Use Myths & Facts
Many myths persist about fair use, an essential right that allows the use of copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder under certain circumstances. We debunk some of the most common fair use myths here.

Myth: Fair use is a defense, or minor exception, not a right.
Fact: Fair use is a right that accommodates the First Amendment.
Fair use is a right explicitly recognized by the Copyright Act.1 The Supreme Court has recognized this right as a “First Amendment safeguard” because copyright law might otherwise constrict freedom of speech.

Myth: Copyright’s primary purpose is rewarding authors and not promoting the public benefit.
Fact: The US Constitution clearly states that the purpose of the intellectual property system is to “promote the progress of science and the useful arts.”
The Supreme Court has repeatedly stressed that the intellectual property system must support the Constitutional rationale and, “The immediate effect of our copyright law is to secure a fair return for an ‘author’s’ creative labor. But the ultimate aim is, by this incentive, to stimulate artistic creativity for the general public good.”2 Fair use promotes this rationale by ensuring works can be used for a variety of purposes.

Myth: Where a specific limitation or exception exists under copyright law, fair use does not apply.
Fact: Fair use is a right that exists in addition to specific exceptions.
While specific exceptions provide certainty for particular activities or apply where fair use does not, the fair use doctrine remains an important right that is flexible and responsive to new technologies and developments, as confirmed by courts.3

Myth: There is no guidance on fair use. 
Fact: The statute, numerous court decisions, and best practices provide ample guidance.
Section 107 of the Copyright Act lays out four factors and also includes a non-exhaustive list of purposes that may be fair use. A multitude of court decisions also provide direction on fair use, particularly with respect to whether a use is transformative and therefore more likely to be considered fair use. Best practices,4 often grounded in court decisions, similarly provide helpful guidance by summarizing the best practices of a particular community.
1. Section 108(f)(4) of the Copyright Act specifically references “the right of fair use as provided by section 107.”
2. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Television Services Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991).
3. See, e.g., Authors Guild v. HathiTrust. The Second Circuit rejected the claim that Section 108 renders fair use inapplicable because of the plain language of the statute.
Additionally, it found the creation of accessible format works for the print disabled was fair use and, as a result, “we need not consider” whether the activity was
permissible under Section 121.
4. Codes of best practices have been created for a variety of communities and purposes. For numerous examples, see Center for Media & Social Impact, “Best Practices,”
accessed January 19, 2017, http://archive.cmsimpact.org/fair-use/best-practices.


Myth: Fair use is only permitted where the use is non-commercial. 
Fact: Courts have upheld fair use for commercial entities and commercial uses in a wide range of cases.
The commercial nature of the use is only one factor for the court to consider. Google, West Publishing, the NFL, and Sony are just a few examples of commercial entities that have prevailed in court cases by relying on fair use.

Myth: Fair use is a US doctrine that breaks from international law and practice.
Fact: Fair use or fair dealing is a doctrine widely incorporated around the world.
The concept of fair use or fair dealing is not unusual or an outlier; fair use or fair dealing exists in more than 40 countries. Both doctrines allow the use of copyrighted materials without permission from the copyright holder under certain circumstances.

Myth: Fair use is a new idea that did not appear in US copyright law until 1976.
Fact: Fair use has a long history and the 1976 Copyright Act simply codified a common law practice.
The Copyright Act codified the four factors derived from Justice Joseph Story’s opinion in the 1843 case, Folsom v. March. However, the doctrine’s origins date back much farther and can be traced back to English caselaw from the 1740s.

Myth: Digitization without authoriza- tion is not fair use. Fair use does
not permit full-text copying.
Fact: Numerous circuits have upheld mirror-image copies as transforma- tive and applied fair use.
The purpose of the digitization of the work is important in making a fair use determination. Numerous courts have found that digitization of a work and ingestion into a database for purpose of search is a quintessentially transforma- tive use.5

Myth: Fair use prohibits any uses that have an effect on the market.
Fact: Fair use is a flexible standard and all four statutory factors are considered together.
The four factors “are to be explored and weighed together, in light of copyright’s purpose.”6 It is not necessary to prevail on each of the four factors for a successful fair use claim. Furthermore, at least one court has determined that the market to be considered is the traditional market for the work and the relevant question is market substitution.7

Myth: Fair use is too uncertain and risky.
Fact: Fair use is a fairly predictable doctrine.
A 2009 study concluded, “Fair use is both more coherent and more predictable than many commentators have perceived once one recognizes that fair use cases fall into common patterns.”8
  1. Many courts have held—both in terms of digitization as well as reprinting—that full copying is permissible under certain circumstances, including in the Second Circuit (Authors Guild v. Google, Authors Guild v. HathiTrust, Bill Graham Archives v. Dorling Kindersley), the Fourth Circuit (A.V. v. iParadigms, LLC), and the Ninth Circuit (Perfect 10 v. Amazon and Kelly v. Arriba Soft).
  2. Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994).
  3. Authors Guild v. HathiTrust, 755 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 2014). 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.